Page 26 - the SyI Quarterly 8
P. 26

Our  Membership














           Can the fate of hostages be determined
           Can the fate of hostages be determined





           from proof-of-life video messages?
           from proof-of-life video messages?





           by Matthew Fields CSyP MSyI




           While terrorist hostage-taking is uncommon, ideologically motivated
           hostage-takers often provide a video demonstrating proof of control
           and proof of life (POL). These videos establish that a hostage is alive at
           the time the video was made, and hence provide valuable information
           for families and governments charged with their safe recovery.

           What they don’t reveal, however, is the likely fate of hostages. Theories
           have been suggested that hostage-taking is a form of organised crime
           where economic concessions are demanded from rational actors
           requiring a benefit. While this may apply in many cases, this article
           argues that each case and hostage-taking group differs, and variables
           apply dependent on the political situation, the group dynamic and
           evolving methodology, and the political ‘win’ current to the prevailing
           conditions (e.g. civil war breakout).

           There is limited research on POL videos and narrative exploration, which can inform thinking as
           to whether hostage-takers are more inclined – through their behaviours and narrative to execute
           hostages, or whether they are holding hostages to obtain political concessions to pursue, fund, and
           finance their strategic attacks and initiatives.

           Addressing the limited research in this area can help support our understanding of the terrorist group
           dynamic, its strategic thinking, and the business model it is employing.

           Furthermore, any hostage rescue operation can significantly increase the risk to the life of a kidnapped
           hostage held by a terrorist group, so insights gained from analysing POL videos have the potential to
           improve operational planning and save lives.

           The Three Types of Hostage Taking

           Firstly, it would be beneficial to establish the three types of hostage-taking

           Hijacking – Hostages are held under duress but the main goal of the terrorists is something other than
           killing the hostages, e.g. the Al-Qaeda-inspired 9/11  attacks, where planes were hijacked and flown into
           iconic buildings.

           Barricade-siege – Terrorists invade a building to kill or hold people hostage. This type of incident
           inevitably provokes a quicker response from the authorities and results in a stand-off, e.g. the Bataclan
           theatre siege where the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) inspired terrorists murdered 90
           people and injured many more.

            Kidnapping – Different to the first two categories in that it is normally a predetermined activity
           involving the instigation of demands or concessions by the hostage-takers.
           Killed or released?


                                                            26
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31